<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Dan's Media Digest - Latest Comments in The Mummy: Tomb Of The Dragon Emperor (2008)</title><link>http://dmd.disqus.com/</link><description>News, reviews and musings on TV/film and related media from the UK and US</description><atom:link href="https://dmd.disqus.com/the_mummy_tomb_of_the_dragon_emperor_2008/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:26:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Mummy: Tomb Of The Dragon Emperor (2008)</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2008/12/mummy-tomb-of-dragon-emperor-2008.html#comment-4427667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mummy 3 would have been improved by four things: Rachel Weisz, Fraser being used more, proper comedy, and a better back-story for the Emperor. The first mummy had a tragic romance that worked very well, but Jet Li has nothing to play here. He's just a bad 'un, through and through. Bland.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Owen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:26:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Mummy: Tomb Of The Dragon Emperor (2008)</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2008/12/mummy-tomb-of-dragon-emperor-2008.html#comment-4411755</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course, they should have just left the first enjoyable Mummy picture as a standalone. Sequels might be okay if they actually bothered to put as much effort into the scripts as they do into the CGI-gasms that usually results from these cash-seeking movies.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">$126191</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:09:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>